Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran

10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1622

Abstract

Background: The reliance on specialized diagnostic techniques is on the rise across various medical fields, including dentistry. While orthopantomogram (OPG), offers many advantages in terms of dental diagnosis, it also poses potential risks to sensitive organs, notably the thyroid gland.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the fluctuations in the absorbed dose within the thyroid gland during swallowing while undergoing an OPG procedure.

Material and Methods: In this computational simulation study, the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code was employed to model an OPG machine, using 700 million particles across the energy range of 60-75 keV, which is standard for OPG procedures. The Monte Carlo (MC) model was cross-verified by comparing the derived spectra with those in the IPEM Report 78. A head and neck phantom was constructed using CT scan images with a slice thickness of 5 mm. This phantom underwent simulated beam exposure under two conditions: pre-swallow and post-swallow. Subsequently, the percentage depth dose was measured and contrasted across different depths.

Results: After swallowing, there was an increase in the absorbed dose across all three regions of the thyroid (right, left, and center). Notably, regions near the hyoid bone exhibited a particularly significant increase in dose. In certain areas, the absorbed dose even tripled when compared to the pre-swallowing state. 

Conclusion: The findings indicate that during OPG imaging, swallowing can lead to an increased radiation dose to the thyroid gland. Given the thyroid’s heightened sensitivity to radiation, such an increase in dosage is noteworthy.

Highlights

Hassan Vafapour (Google Scholar)

Zaker Salehi (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. Laishram A, Thongam K, editors. Detection and classification of dental pathologies using faster-RCNN in orthopantomogram radiography image. 7th international conference on signal processing and integrated networks (SPIN); Noida, India: IEEE; 2020. p. 423-8.
  2. ALHumaid J, Buholayka M, Thapasum A, Alhareky M, Abdelsalam M, Bughsan A. Investigating prevalence of dental anomalies in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia through digital orthopantomogram. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(5):2900-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.023. PubMed PMID: 34025167. PubMed PMCID: PMC8117041.
  3. National Radiological Protection Board. National Radiological Protection Board Account 2004-2005. Corporate report; London: The Stationery Office; 2005. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7586e240f0b6397f35f1cb/0386.pdf.
  4. Williams JR, Montgomery A. Measurement of dose in panoramic dental radiology. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(873):1002-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.873.11064656. PubMed PMID: 11064656.
  5. Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Franchi B, D’Onofrio A, Piazzi V, Rondi E, et al. Thyroid disorders in patients treated with radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: a retrospective analysis of seventy-three patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.051. PubMed PMID: 17084554.
  6. Chen J, You H, Li K. A review of thyroid gland segmentation and thyroid nodule segmentation methods for medical ultrasound images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;185:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105329. PubMed PMID: 31955006.
  7. Khan YS, Farhana A. Histology, Thyroid Gland. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  8. Barbieri A, Prasad ML, Gilani SM. Thyroid tissue outside the thyroid gland: Differential diagnosis and associated diagnostic challenges. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020;48:151584. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151584. PubMed PMID: 32871503.
  9. Braverman LE, Cooper D. Werner & Ingbar’s the thyroid: a fundamental and clinical text. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  10. Zhou H, Keall PJ, Graves EE. A bone composition model for Monte Carlo x-ray transport simulations. Med Phys. 2009;36(3):1008-18. doi: 10.1118/1.3077129. PubMed PMID: 19378761.
  11. Morrison GD. Catalogue of Diagnostic X-ray Spectra and Other Data (IPEM Report 78), £20 , K. Cranley, B.J. Gilmore, G.W.A. Fogarty, L. Desponds (Eds.), The Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology (1997), ISBN: 090418188X. 1998;4(3):228-9. doi: 10.1016/S1078-8174(98)80053-9.
  12. Kinhikar RA, Tambe CM, Patil K, Mandavkar M, Deshpande DD, Gujjalanavar R, et al. Estimation of dose enhancement to soft tissue due to backscatter radiation near metal interfaces during head and neck radiothearpy - A phantom dosimetric study with radiochromic film. J Med Phys. 2014;39(1):40-3. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.125501. PubMed PMID: 24600171. PubMed PMCID: PMC3931227.
  13. Jamal NHM, Sayed IS, Syed WS. Estimation of organ absorbed dose in pediatric chest X-ray examination: A phantom study. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2020;166:108472. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108472.
  14. Rosengren B, Wulff L, Carlsson E, Carlsson J, Montelius A, Russell K, Grusell E. Backscatter radiation at tissue-titanium interfaces. Analyses of biological effects from 60Co and protons. Acta Oncol. 1991;30(7):859-66. doi: 10.3109/02841869109091835. PubMed PMID: 1662525.
  15. Wong JW, Sharpe MB, Jaffray DA, Kini VR, Robertson JM, Stromberg JS, Martinez AA. The use of active breathing control (ABC) to reduce margin for breathing motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(4):911-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00056-5. PubMed PMID: 10386650.