Document Type : Original Research
Authors
- Zahra Mohamadi Baghmolaei 1
- Reza Fardid 1
- Masoud Haghani 1
- Gholamhassan Haddadi 1
- Mohammad Abdolahi 2
- Mohammad Ghaderian 3
1 Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
3 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
Background: Nuclear medicine is an integral and developing field in diagnosing and treating diseases. Monitoring individuals’ protection and radiation contamination in the workplace is vital for preserving working environments.
Objective: This study aimed to monitor the nuclear medicine department’s personnel, environment, and wastes to determine the level of occupational radiation and environmental pollution in Bushehr’s nuclear medicine department.
Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the initial activity of each radioisotope, radiopharmaceutical, and radioactive waste was measured using a “well counter” daily for three months. Three irradiators’ absorbed doses were measured using a direct reading dosimeter. The contamination was determined using an indirect wipe test method on various surfaces. A Geiger Müller dosimeter was employed to examine personnel’s hands, clothing, and footwear.
Results: The highest activity was observed in technetium waste (1118.31 mCi). Every irradiator received a lower absorption dose than the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) standard threshold. The majority of contamination was associated with the exercise test room (0.04 Bq/cm2) and its work surface (0.013 Bq/cm2), which were both below the threshold (0.5 Bq/cm2). Staff monitoring indicated that two nurses (10 and 11 individuals) had the highest contamination rate (23.7%).
Conclusion: Daily assessment of the type, activity, and method of radiopharmaceutical administration to the patient is advantageous for waste management. Surface contamination monitoring can significantly contribute to the estimation of the level of radiation pollution in the environment.
Highlights
Masoud Haghani (Google Scholar)
Keywords
- Krajewska G, Pachocki KA. Assessment of exposure of workers to ionizing radiation from radioiodine and technetium in nuclear medicine departmental facilities. Med Pr. 2013;64(5):625-30. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.2013.0061. PubMed PMID: 24502125.
- Bouzarjomehri F, Tsapaki V. Active personal dosimeter in a nuclear medicine center in Yazd City, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2011;1(1):28-33.
- Chen MY. Radiation protection and regulations for the nuclear medicine physician. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(3):215-28. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.005. PubMed PMID: 24832587.
- Martin CJ, Harrison JD, Rehani MM. Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future. Phys Med. 2020;79:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020. PubMed PMID: 33197830.
- Adliene D, Griciene B, Skovorodko K, Laurikaitiene J, Puiso J. Occupational radiation exposure of health professionals and cancer risk assessment for Lithuanian nuclear medicine workers. Environ Res. 2020;183:109144. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109144. PubMed PMID: 32028181.
- Motevalli SM, Borhanazad AM. Assessment of occupational exposure in medical practice in Tehran, Iran. Rom Rep Phys. 2015;67(2):431-8.
- Suliman II, Salih LH, Ali DM, Alaamer AS, Al-Rajhi MA, Alkhorayef M, Bradley DA. Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine and interventional cardiology departments in Sudan: Are they following radiation protection standards? Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2019;160:100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.03.004
- Habib MA, Rahman MS, Das PK, Roy SK, Yeasmin S. Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. European Journal of Environment and Public Health. 2020;5(1):em0061. doi: 10.29333/ejeph/8576.
- Ciraj-Bjelac O, Carinou E, Vanhavere F. Use of active personal dosimeters in hospitals: EURADOS survey. J Radiol Prot. 2018;38(2):702-15. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aabce1. PubMed PMID: 29633720.
- Tanyildizi H, Cavdar I, Demir M. A Clinical Trial of the Evaluation of Environmental Exposure in Yttrium 90 Radioembolization. Sakarya University Journal of Science. 2018;22(6):1820-7. doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.418634.
- Brown A. The Impact of Metastable Lutetium-177 on a Nuclear Medicine Department. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2020;61(Suppl 1):3021.
- Ravichandran R, Binukumar JP, Sreeram R, Arunkumar LS. An overview of radioactive waste disposal procedures of a nuclear medicine department. J Med Phys. 2011;36(2):95-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.79692. PubMed PMID: 21731225. PubMed PMCID: PMC3119958.
- Barbosa N, Castillo LS, Quimbayo JS. Discharges of Nuclear Medicine Radioisotopes: The Impact of an Abatement System. Health Phys. 2022;122(5):586-93. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001543. PubMed PMID: 35383635.
- Tsapaki V, Balter S, Cousins C, Holmberg O, Miller DL, Miranda P, et al. The International Atomic Energy Agency action plan on radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures: Achieving change in practice. Phys Med. 2018;52:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.634. PubMed PMID: 30139610.
- Guidotti TL. The Canadian guide to health and the environment. University of Alberta Press; 1999.
- Beiki D, Shhahosseini S, Eftekhari M, Takavar A, Fard-Esfahani A. Contamination monitoring of Na¹³¹I levels in therapy unit of Research Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences by indirect method (Wipe test). Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2003;11(1):9-16.
- Rostampour N, Almasi T, Arabian K, Sharifi M, Rashidi M, Bayat F. Evaluation of Radioactive Contamination in Hamadan Nuclear Medicine Centers Using Wipe Technique. Health and Safety at Work. 2014;3(4):69-76.
- Kai M, Homma T, Lochard J, Schneider T, Lecomte JF, Nisbet A, et al. ICRP Publication 146: Radiological Protection of People and the Environment in the Event of a Large Nuclear Accident: Update of ICRP PUBLICATIONS 109 AND 111. Ann ICRP. 2020;49(4):11-135. doi: 10.1177/0146645320952659. PubMed PMID: 33291942.
- Strauss KJ, Kaste SC. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(Suppl 2):110-2. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0184-4. PubMed PMID: 16862422. PubMed PMCID: PMC2663649.
)