Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Health Information Management and Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to determine attitudes and effective factors in the acceptance of smart phones by physicians of the largest University of Medical Sciences in the south of Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in 2014. Study participants included 200 physicians working in the hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences selected through two-stage stratified sampling, but 185 participants completed the study. The study data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire completed through a 5-point Likert scale. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of experts, its construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis, and its reliability by Cronbach’s alpha of 0.802. All data analyses were performed using SPSS (version 22) and LISREL (version 8.8).
Results: Results showed that most physicians had a desirable attitude towards using smart phones. Besides, the results of SEM indicated a significant relationship between attitude and compatibility, observability, personal experience, voluntariness of use and perceived usefulness. Moreover, some important fitness indices revealed appropriate fitness of the study model (p=0.26, X2/df=1.35, RMR=0.070, GFI=0.77, AGFI=0.71, NNFI=0.93, CFI=0.94).
Conclusion: The results revealed that compatibility, observability, personal experience, voluntariness of use and perceived usefulness were effective in the physicians’ attitude towards using smart phones. Thus, by preparation of the required infrastructures, policymakers in the field of health technology can enhance the utilization of smart phones in hospitals.

Keywords

  1. Chang MK, Cheung W. Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study. Information & Management. 2001;39(1):1-14. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00075-1.
  2. Phua J, Lim TK. How residents and interns utilise and perceive the personal digital assistant and UpToDate. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:39. doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-8-39. PubMed PMID: 18625038. PubMed PMCID: 2483706.
  3. Chatterley T, Chojecki D. Personal digital assistant usage among undergraduate medical students: exploring trends, barriers, and the advent of smartphones. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98(2):157-60. doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.008. PubMed PMID: 20428281. PubMed PMCID: 2859274.
  4. Stroud SD, Erkel EA, Smith CA. The use of personal digital assistants by nurse practitioner students and faculty. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2005;17(2):67-75. doi.org/10.1111/j.1041-2972.2005.00013.x. PubMed PMID: 15715901.
  5. Putzer GJ, Park Y. Are physicians likely to adopt emerging mobile technologies? Attitudes and innovation factors affecting smartphone use in the Southeastern United States. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1b. PubMed PMID: 22737094. PubMed PMCID: 3329206.
  6. Yu C-S, Tao Y-H. Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption. Technovation. 2009;29(2):92-109. doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.007.
  7. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989;13:319-40. doi.org/10.2307/249008.
  8. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management. 2003;40(3):191-204. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.
  9. Starkweather WM, Wallin CC. Faculty response to library technology: insights on attitudes. Library trends. 1999;47(4):640.
  10. Kim D, Ammeter T. Predicting personal information system adoption using an integrated diffusion model. Information & Management. 2014;51(4):451-64. doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.02.011.
  11. Mekić E, Özlen MK. Acceptance of smartphones by users in BiH through extended technology acceptance model. И ССЛЕД. 2014;136.
  12. Putzer GJ, Park Y. The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010;7:1b. PubMed PMID: 20697467; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2805554.
  13. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2010.
  14. Pikkarainen T, Pikkarainen K, Karjaluoto H, Pahnila S. Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet research. 2004;14(3):224-35. doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542652.
  15. Malkary G. Health Care Without Bounds: Point of Care Computing for Nursing. Spyglass Consulting Group; 2012. p. 89-112.
  16. In: Mobi health news: Dolan B. 72 percent of US physicians use smartphones. (May 5, 2010). Available from: http://mobihealthnews.com/7505/72-percent-of-us-physicians-use-smartphones/.
  17. Park Y, Chen JV. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2007;107(9):1349-65. doi.org/10.1108/02635570710834009.
  18. Tahamtan I. A qualitative study on the use of personal digital assistants and smartphones among interns and residents of Hazrat Rasool Akram and Imam-Khomeini hospitals [dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2011.
  19. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Reconceptualizing organizational support and its effect on information technology usage: Evidence from the health care sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2008;48(4):69-76.
  20. Eason K, Waterson P. The implications of e-health system delivery strategies for integrated healthcare: lessons from England. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(5):e96-e106. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.004. PubMed PMID: 23266062.
  21. Saber Chtourou M, Souiden N. Rethinking the TAM model: time to consider fun. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2010;27(4):336-44. doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052378.
  22. Liao C-H, Tsou C-W, Huang M-F. Factors influencing the usage of 3G mobile services in Taiwan. Online Information Review. 2007;31(6):759-74. doi.org/10.1108/14684520710841757.
  23. Jahangir N, Begum N. The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking. African Journal of Business Management. 2008;2(2):32.
  24. Rahmati F, Navid BJ, AliShiri G. Factors Effective on the Adoption of Internet Banking (A Case Study ofIlam Province Banks). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 2013;4(8)