Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Candidate, Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Candidate, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 MSc, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 PhD, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7 PhD, Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

8 PhD, Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: There are many studies to investigate the effects of each interacting component of tumor-immune system interactions. In all these studies, the distinct effect of each component was investigated. As the interaction of tumor-immune system has feedback and is complex, the alternation of each component may affect other components indirectly.
Objective: Because of the complexities of tumor-immune system interactions, it is important to determine the mutual behavior of such components. We need a careful observation to extract these mutual interactions. Achieving these observations using experiments is costly and time-consuming.
Material and Methods: In this experimental and based on mathematical modeling study, to achieve these observations, we presented a fuzzy structured agent-based model of tumor-immune system interactions. In this study, we consider the confronting of the effector cells of the adaptive immune system in the presence of the cytokines of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) as a fuzzy structured model. Using the experimental data of murine models of B16F10 cell line of melanoma cancer cells, we optimized the parameters of the model.
Results: Using the output of this model, we determined the rules which could occur. As we optimized the parameters of the model using escape state of the tumor and then the rules which we obtained, are the rules of tumor escape.
Conclusion: The results showed that using fuzzy structured agent-based model, we are able to show different output of the tumor-immune system interactions, which are caused by the stochastic behavior of each cell. But different output of the model just follow the predetermined behavior, and using this behavior, we can achieve the rules of interactions.

Keywords

  1. Figueredo GP, Siebers PO, Aickelin U. Investigating mathematical models of immuno-interactions with early-stage cancer under an agent-based modelling perspective. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14 Suppl 6:S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S6-S6. PubMed PMID: 23734575. PubMed PMCID: 3633017.
  2. Araujo RP, McElwain DL. A history of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling. Bull Math Biol. 2004;66:1039-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bulm.2003.11.002. PubMed PMID: 15294418.
  3. Roose T, Chapman SJ, Maini PK. Mathematical models of avascular tumor growth. Siam Review. 2007;49:179-208. doi: 10.1137/S0036144504446291.
  4. Chaplain MA. Modelling aspects of cancer growth: insight from mathematical and numerical analysis and computational simulation. Multiscale Problems in the Life Sciences; Springer; 2008. p. 147-200.
  5. Eftimie R, Bramson JL, Earn DJ. Interactions between the immune system and cancer: a brief review of non-spatial mathematical models. Bull Math Biol. 2011;73:2-32. doi: 10.1007/s11538-010-9526-3. PubMed PMID: 20225137.
  6. Tao Y, Guo Q, Aihara K. A partial differential equation model and its reduction to an ordinary differential equation model for prostate tumor growth under intermittent hormone therapy. J Math Biol. 2014;69:817-38. doi: 10.1007/s00285-013-0718-y. PubMed PMID: 23982260.
  7. Mazdeyasna S, Jafari A, Hadjati J, Allahverdy A, Alavi-Moghaddam M. Modeling the Effect of Chemotherapy on Melanoma B16F10 in Mice Using Cellular Automata and Genetic Algorithm in Tapered Dosage of FBS and Cisplatin. Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies. 2015;2:103-8.
  8. Nagy JD. The ecology and evolutionary biology of cancer: a review of mathematical models of necrosis and tumor cell diversity. Math Biosci Eng. 2005;2:381-418. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.381. PubMed PMID: 20369929.
  9. Wang Z, Butner JD, Kerketta R, Cristini V, Deisboeck TS, editors. Simulating cancer growth with multiscale agent-based modeling. Seminars in cancer biology; Elsevier; 2015.
  10. Kirkwood TB. Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) ‘On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies’. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370.
  11. Boon T, Van Der Bruggen P. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1996;183:725-9. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.725. PubMed PMID: 8642276. PubMed PMCID: 2192342.
  12. Khar A. Mechanisms involved in natural killer cell mediated target cell death leading to spontaneous tumour regression. Journal of biosciences. 1997;22:23-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02703615.
  13. Owen MR, Sherratt JA. Modelling the macrophage invasion of tumours: effects on growth and composition. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1998;15:165-85. doi: 10.1093/imammb/15.2.165. PubMed PMID: 9661282.
  14. De Pillis L, Radunskaya A. A mathematical model of immune response to tumor invasion. Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics; Elsevier Science Ltd; 2003. p. 1661-8.
  15. Arciero J, Jackson T, Kirschner D. A mathematical model of tumor-immune evasion and siRNA treatment. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B. 2004;4:39-58.
  16. Esmaili SS, Nasrabadi AM. Different initial conditions in fuzzy Tumor model. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2010;3:1002. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2010.310130.
  17. Figueredo GP, Siebers PO, Owen MR, Reps J, Aickelin U. Comparing stochastic differential equations and agent-based modelling and simulation for early-stage cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095150. PubMed PMID: 24752131. PubMed PMCID: 3994035.
  18. Norton KA, Popel AS. An agent-based model of cancer stem cell initiated avascular tumour growth and metastasis: the effect of seeding frequency and location. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20140640. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0640. PubMed PMID: 25185580. PubMed PMCID: 4191089.
  19. Mullins DW, Martins RS, Burger CJ, Elgert KD. Tumor cell-derived TGF-beta and IL-10 dysregulate paclitaxel-induced macrophage activation. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;69:129-37. PubMed PMID: 11200057.
  20. Khoja L, Lorigan P, Zhou C, Lancashire M, Booth J, Cummings J, et al. Biomarker utility of circulating tumor cells in metastatic cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:1582-90. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.468. PubMed PMID: 23223143.