Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 PhD, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, United States

3 PhD, Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

4 DDS, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 DDS, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

6 MSc, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1268

Abstract

Background: During the last decade, people have been dramatically exposed to radiation emitted from widely-used radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) generating devices. 
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of exposure to RF-EMF emitted from smart phones and Wi-Fi routers on the growth rate and antibiotic sensitivity of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) as a pathogen in the root canals of teeth.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, E. faecalis ATCC 19115 was used, characterized and confirmed by morphological and biochemical tests. Antibiotic susceptibility test was measured for several common antibiotics. To perform antibiotic susceptibility tests, disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates was used before and after exposure to RF-EMFs emitted from a commercial Wi-Fi router or a mobile phone simulator. Moreover, we measured the optical density at 625 nm after different exposure times using a calibrated UV-visible spectrophotometer to evaluate the effect of RF-EMF exposure on the bacterial growth rate. 
Results: Exposure to RF-EMF significantly altered the antimicrobial sensitivity of the E. faecalis. While, the susceptibility of the bacteria decreased significantly after 6 h of exposure, longer exposure time (e.g. exposure for 24 h) increased the susceptibility of the bacteria to all antibiotics. Furthermore, it was found that the bacteria tended to regress to their early state. Moreover, the non-exposed E. faecalis showed a slower growth rate than the bacteria exposed to RF-EMFs.  
Conclusion: Exposure to RF-EMF emitted by Wi-Fi routers or mobile phone simulator can significantly change the antibiotic susceptibility and growth rate of E. faecalis.

Keywords

Introduction

During the last decade, dramatic exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) generated by various satellite, telecommunication systems, cellular phones, microwave ovens, and military radars has been observed due to greater use of technology. It has been demonstrated that very small doses of EMF can affect the biological functions of living organisms such as bacteria. The external EMF can change the membrane processes and metabolic state of bacteria and their response to chemical factors and antibiotics. The bacterial resistance to antibiotics is on increase. Therefore, evaluation of the EMF effects on bacteria seems to be necessary to investigate the antibiotic resistance pattern correlation with the possibility of controlling bacteria in the environment or in the clinical laboratories. EMF may be useful in therapeutic practices, controlling the sensitivity of bacteria toward antibiotics and also investigating the effect of environmental stress on biological systems.

The biological effects of EMFs usage were considered in 1976 for the first time. It has been clearly revealed that EMF can negatively or positively affect bacterial growth and antibiotic sensitivity depending on EMF wavelength, intensity, coherence, exposure duration, the type of bacterial cells, bacterial growth phase, and composition of growth media. Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a microorganism detected in asymptomatic, persistent endodontic infections with a prevalence of 24% to 77% [ 1 ]. It has a pathogenic role in chronic endodontic treatment failure [ 2 ]. Several studies have been conducted on the biological effects of EMF on different microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Dictyostelium discoideum, Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated virus, Paramecium, Enterococcus hirae, and Entamoeba invadens [ 3 - 12 ]. In spite of this, to the best of our knowledge, our experiment is the first study on the effects of RF-EMFs on E. faecalis. Given this consideration, the present study aimed at investigating the effects of exposure to RF-EMFs generated by mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices on the growth rate and antibiotic susceptibility of E. faecalis.

Material and Methods

Antibiotic Susceptibility Test

In this experimental study, E. faecalis ATCC 19115 was used, characterized, and confirmed by morphological and biochemical tests. Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHA-Biolife, Italy) was used to dilute the pure culture of E. feacalis and then grown to reach 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. The bacterial suspension was cultured on the plates, treated with a set of 10 antimicrobial substance disks, and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h (overnight condition). The test was carried out by the disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer method) on Mueller-Hinton agar plates according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2016).

Antimicrobial Agents

Antibiotic disks used for E. faecalis tests were Imipenem (IMI 10 μg), Levofloxacin (LEV 5 μg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 μg), Piperacillin (PIP 100 μg), Doxycycline (DOX 30 μg), Azithromycin (AZI 30 μg), Vancomycin (VAN 30 μg), Ampicillin (AMP 10 μg), Amoxicillin (AMOX 30 μg), and Tetracyclin (TET 30 μg).

All antibiotic disks were purchased from ROSCO Diagnostica (DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark). We measured and analyzed the antibiotic susceptibility both before and after exposure to RF-EMFs generated by Wi-Fi and RF simulator. The diameter of the inhibition zone for each antibiotic was calculated as the average of at least 2 different measurements. Moreover, for each regime, three replicate agar plates were used.

Wi-Fi Router

The exposure source in this study was a D-Link Wi-Fi router (D-Link, D-Link Corporation, Taiwan). During the exposure time, data were exchanging at a constant rate between the modem and a laptop computer. The laptop was placed in another room 5 meters away from the Wi-Fi router. The Wi-Fi router was operating at 1W and the specific absorption rate (SAR) was 0.13 W/kg. Each bacterial sample was collected after a specific exposure time (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h after the start of exposure), and the antibacterial susceptibility tests were carried out.

Radiofrequency Simulator

A GSM 900/1800 MHz mobile simulator was used in this study as the radiation source. This simulator was designed and manufactured at the Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering of Shiraz Medical School by the active cooperation of the private sector.

Outgrowth Curve

To evaluate the effects of RF-EMF exposure on the growth rate of bacteria, the optical density (OD) at 625 nm [ 13 ] was measured using a UV-visible Spectrophotometer (UNICO UV-2100 Spectrophotometer, UNICO, USA) and the growth curve was drawn.

Statistical Analysis

For both exposure and control groups, all experiments were replicated three times. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the means. Moreover, the statistical significance of the differences observed among the means was determined using SPSS (version 18). P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, antimicrobial susceptibility of E. faecalis to several common antibiotics after exposure to 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation was carried out. The antimicrobial susceptibility was recorded as an inhibition zone diameter for each antibiotic disk. Besides, Figures 1 and 2 showed the effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation on the growth rate of the bacteria for the exposed and non-exposed bacteria. The antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacteria was altered during exposure to RF, but at the 6th h of exposure, a significant decrease in the susceptibility of E. faecalis was seen (P < 0.05).

Figure 1. Growth curves of E. feacalis before and after exposure to Wi-Fi radiation

Figure 2. Growth curves of E. feacalis before and after exposure to radiofrequency (RF) simulator radiation

According to Tables 1 and 2, the antimicrobial susceptibility of the bacteria was alterd after exposure to radiofrequency radiation (2.4 GHz), which may be because of changes in their physicochemical characteristics. Hence, the inhibition zone diameters of the exposed and non-exposed E. faecalis for each antibiotic were determined at different times after exposure.

Exposure Time Wi-Fi Exposure
Drug Control (Mean ± SD) Exposure (Mean ± SD) P Value
2h PIP 28.6±0.58 28.3±0.58 0.456
AZI 13±0 12.3±0.58 0.114
LEV 21.3±0.58 21.3±0.58 1.000
AMP 26.3±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.197
VAN 15.3±0.58 14.6±0.58 0.197
DOX 17.3±0.58 16±0 0.034
CIP 20.3±0.58 19.3±0.58 0.099
TET 14±0 14±0 1.000
IMI 29.3±0.58 27.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 30.3±0.58 0.099
4h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 12.3±0.58 0.114
LEV 21.3±0.58 20.3±0.58 0.099
AMP 26.3±0.58 25.3±0.58 0.099
VAN 15.6±0.58 16±0 0.114
DOX 17.3±0.58 15.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 18.6±0.58 0.043
TET 14±0 13.6±0.58 0.317
IMI 29.3±0.58 27±0 0.034
AMOX 31.3±0.58 28.3±0.58 0.043
6h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0,043
AZI 13±0 10.6±0.58 0.034
LEV 21.3±0.58 17.3±0.58 0,043
AMP 26.3±0.58 23.3±0.58 0.043
VAN 15.6±0.58 15±0 0.317
DOX 17.3±0.58 14.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 20.6±0.58 0.456
TET 14±0 12.3±0.58 0.034
IMI 29.3±0.58 24.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 30.3±0.58 0.099
8h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 13±0 1.000
LEV 21.3±0.58 20.3±0.58 0.099
AMP 26.3±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.197
VAN 15.6±0.58 14.6±0.58 0.197
DOX 17.3±0.58 15.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 20±0 1.000
TET 14±0 14.6±0.58 0.114
IMI 29.3±0.58 26.3±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 26.3±0.58 0.043
10h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13 13 1.000
LEV 21.3±0.58 20.3±0.58 0.099
AMP 26.3±0.58 25.3±0.58 0.099
VAN 15.6±0.58 14.6±0.58 0,197
DOX 17.3±0.58 16.3±0.58 0.099
CIP 20.3±0.58 20±0 0.317
TET 14±0 14.3±0.58 0.317
IMI 29.3±0.58 27.3±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 29.3±0.58 0.043
24h PIP 28.6±0.58 28.6±0.58 1.000
AZI 13±0 13±0 1.000
LEV 21.3±0.58 21.6±0.58 0.456
AMP 26.3±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.456
VAN 15.6±0.58 16.6±0.58 0.068
DOX 17.3±0.58 16.6±0.58 0.197
CIP 20.3±0.58 18.3±0.58 0.043
TET 14±0 15±0 0.025
IMI 29.3±0.58 28.6±0.58 0.197
AMOX 31.3±0.58 30±0 0.034
PIP: Piperacillin, AZI: Azithromycin, LEV: Levofloxacin, AMP: Ampicillin, VAN: Vancomycin, DOX: Doxycycline, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, TET: Tetracyclin, IMI: Imipenem, AMOX: Amoxicillin
Table 1.Inhibition zone diameters before and after exposure to Wi-Fi radiation for E. faecalis
Exposure Time RF Radiation
DRUG Control (Mean ± SD) Exposure (Mean ± SD) P Value
2h PIP 28.6±0.58 27.3±0.58 0.068
AZI 13±0 12.3±0.58 0.114
LEV 21.3±0.58 20±0 0.034
AMP 26.3±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.456
VAN 15.6±0.58 15.6±0.58 1.000
DOX 17.3±0.58 16±0 0.034
CIP 20.3±0.58 19.3±0.58 0.099
TET 14±0 14±0 1.000
IMI 29.3±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 29.6±0.58 0.043
4h PIP 28.6±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 12.3±0.58 0.114
LEV 21.3±0.58 20.3±0.58 0.099
AMP 26.3±0.58 28.6±0.58 0.043
VAN 15.6±0.58 15.6±0.58 1.000
DOX 17.3±0.58 15.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 18.6±0.58 0.043
TET 14±0 13.6±0.58 0.317
IMI 29.3±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 30±0 0.034
6h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 11.6±0.58 0.034
LEV 21.3±0.58 20.3±0.58 0.099
AMP 26.3±0.58 28.3±0.58 0.043
VAN 15.6±0.58 15.6±0.58 1.000
DOX 17.3±0.58 14.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 20.6±0.58 0.456
TET 14±0 12.3±0.58 0.034
IMI 29.3±0.58 26.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 30.3±0.58 0.099
8h PIP 28.6±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 13±0 1.000
LEV 21.3±0.58 17.3±0.58 0.043
AMP 26.3±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.197
VAN 15.6±0.58 15.3±0.58 0.456
DOX 17.3±0.58 15.6±0.58 0.043
CIP 20.3±0.58 20±0 0.317
TET 14±0 14.6±0.58 0.114
IMI 29.3±0.58 25.3±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 29.6±0.58 0.043
10h PIP 28.6±0.58 24.6±0.58 0.043
AZI 13±0 13±0 1.000
LEV 21.3±0.58 20±0 0.034
AMP 26.3±0.58 26±0 0.317
VAN 15.6±0.58 15±0 0.114
DOX 17.3±0.58 16.3±0.58 0.099
CIP 20.3±0.58 20±0 0.317
TET 14±0 14.3±0.58 0.317
IMI 29.3±0.58 24.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 25.6±0.58 0.043
24h PIP 28.6±0.58 28.6±0.58 1.000
AZI 13±0 16.6±0.58 0.034
LEV 21.3±0.58 21.3±0.58 1.000
AMP 26.3±0.58 31.6±0.58 0.043
VAN 15.6±0.58 16±0 0.317
DOX 17.3±0.58 16.6±0.58 0.197
CIP 20.3±0.58 21.3±0.58 0.099
TET 14±0 16.6±0.58 0.034
IMI 29.3±0.58 27.6±0.58 0.043
AMOX 31.3±0.58 34.6±0.58 0.043
RF: Radiofrequency, PIP: Piperacillin, AZI: Azithromycin, LEV: Levofloxacin, AMP: Ampicillin, VAN: Vancomycin, DOX: Doxycycline, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, TET: Tetracyclin, IMI: Imipenem, AMOX: Amoxicillin
Table 2.Inhibition zone diameters before and after exposure to radiofrequency (RF) simulator radiation for E. faecalis

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, there were no changes significantly in the bacterial sensitivity after the 3rd and until the 6th h of exposure; however, after the 6th h of exposure, a maximum significant fall in the antibacterial sensitivity of the bacteria was showed. At the more exposure times (24 h exposure), the sensitivity of E. faecalis to all antibiotics increased and bacteria returned to the early state. In addition, the effects of radiofrequency radiation on the growth rate of bacteria were carried out (Figures 3 and 4). Based on Figures 3 and 4, bacteria in the non-exposed groups had a slower growth rate than those which were exposed to radiation in the exponential phase.

Figure 3. Inhibition zone diameters pre and post-exposure to Wi-Fi radiation for E. feacalis

Figure 4. Inhibition zone diameters pre- and post-exposure to radiofrequency (RF) simulator radiation for E. feacalis

Discussion

Altogether the findings of this study are in line with the former studies that aimed at investigating the effects of RF-EMF on the susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae [ 6 , 14 ], Listeria monocytogenes, and E. coli [ 7 ] to antibiotics after irradiation with 2.4 GHz (Wi-Fi router radiation) and 900 MHz (mobile phone simulator) and confirm the existence of the so-called “window theory” [ 3 , 14 - 18 ]. According to window theory, when the exposure level (ionizing or nonionizing radiation) lies within the window (lies between the lower and upper levels), exposure can lead to the occurrence of some stimulatory effects.

The effect of EMF is generally dependent on physical characteristics of the radiation applied (frequency, intensity, duration of exposure) and the biological characteristics of the bacteria (cell metabolic state, genotype, membrane proportion, bacterial growth phase). EMF interaction with bacteria can change the metabolic state of the bacteria and sensitivity to chemical agents such as antibiotics. Torgomyan et al. reported a decrease in the bacterial growth specific rate of E. coli and E. hirae, and an increase in the bacterial sensitivity towards antibiotics [ 8 ]. Kamel et al. found that the high-frequency magnetic fields caused a significant decrease in the number of S. aureus and increased sensitivity of S. aureus to the antibiotic [ 10 ]. The inhibitory effect of extremely high-frequency EMF on the growth properties of E. hirae, E. coli, and L. acidophilus has been found [ 3 - 8 ]. The present study showed that EMF significantly decreased the bacterial growth rate and changed the antibiotic resistance. Therefore, EMF can be used in biotechnology and therapeutic practices.

The depression of bacterial growth after EMF exposure has been related to the effect on three different targets, including bacterial membranes, water in the surrounding media and nucleotides. Previous studies demonstrated that extremely low-frequency EMFs can cause physiological outcomes in living organisms. These fields can cause the alteration in the growth rate and morphology of bacteria. Most previous studies showed a decrease in the growth of bacteria. Therefore, these investigations have considered that the alteration caused by EMFs could be exploited for beneficial purposes and controlling bacterial infections. Nowadays, EMFs have been applied for therapeutic application as a monotherapy or combined with antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, EMF is used in disinfecting applications in meat, rice, and agriculture treatments.

Conclusion

Exposure to RF-EMF emitted by Wi-Fi routers or mobile phone simulator significantly altered the antimicrobial sensitivity of the E. faecalis. The susceptibility of the bacteria decreased significantly after 6 h of exposure, longer exposure times (e.g. exposure for 24 h) increased the sensitivity of the bacteria to all antibiotics. Furthermore, bacteria exposed to radiation had a faster growth rate compared to non-exposed bacteria. These findings may have implications for the management of endodontic infections.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Vice-Chancellory of Research Shiraz University of Medical Science for supporting this research (Grant# 12878). This article is based on the thesis by Dr. Salar Khandadash. The authors also thank Dr. Vosough of the Dental Research Development Center, of the School of Dentistry for the statistical analysis and Dr. Shokrpour for improving the use of English in the manuscript.

Authors’ Contribution

SMJ. Mortazavi conceived the idea. Introduction and manuscript of the paper was written by SMJ. Mortazavi, M. Paknahad. The method implementation and experimental studies was carried out by M. Taheri and Analysis was carried out by S. Khandadash. All the authors read, modified, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

The Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences approved the protocol of the study (Ethic cod: IR.SUMS.REC.1395.S1167).

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32(2):93-8. DOI | PubMed
  2. Love R. Enterococcus faecalis–a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. 2001; 34(5):399-405. DOI | PubMed
  3. Mortazavi SMJ, Mosleh-Shirazi M, Tavassoli A, et al. A comparative study on the increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays after exposure to microwave radiation and oral intake of flaxseed oil. Int J Radiat Res. 2011; 9(1):9-14.
  4. Segatore B, Setacci D, Bennato F, et al. Evaluations of the effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on growth and antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Microbiol. 2012; 2012(2):587293. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed
  5. Taheri M, Darabyan M, Izadbakhsh E, et al. Exposure to Visible Light Emitted from Smartphones and Tablets Increases the Proliferation of Staphylococcus aureus: Can this be Linked to Acne?. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2017; 7(2):163-8. Publisher Full Text | PubMed
  6. Taheri M, Moradi M, Mortazavi SMJ, et al. Evaluation of the 900 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation Effects on the Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Growth Rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Shiraz E-Med J. 2017; 18(3):e44946. DOI
  7. Taheri M, Mortazavi SMJ, Moradi M, et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted From Wi-Fi Router and Mobile Phone Simulator on the Antibacterial Susceptibility of Pathogenic Bacteria Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. Dose-Response. 2017; 15(1):1-8. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed
  8. Torgomyan H, Trchounian A. Escherichia coli membrane-associated energy-dependent processes and sensitivity toward antibiotics changes as responses to low-intensity electromagnetic irradiation of 70. 6 and 73 GHz frequencies. Cell Biochem Biophys 2012; 62(3):451-61. DOI | PubMed
  9. Torgomyan H, Tadevosyan H, Trchounian A. Extremely high frequency electromagnetic irradiation in combination with antibiotics enhances antibacterial effects on Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol. 2011; 62(3):962-7. DOI | PubMed
  10. Kamel FH, Saeed CH, Qader SS. Magnetic Field Effect on Growth and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus. Al-Nahrain J Science. 2014; 17(3):138-43. DOI
  11. Amani S, Taheri M, Movahedi MM, et al. Evaluation of Short-Term Exposure to 2. 4 GHz Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted from Wi-Fi Routers on the Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. GMJ 2020; 9:1580. DOI
  12. Movahedi MM, Nouri F, Golpaygani AT, et al. Antibacterial susceptibility pattern of the pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococcus aureus after exposure to electromagnetic waves emitted from mobile phone simulator. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019; 9(6):637-46. DOI
  13. Ziaei-Darounkalaei N, Ameri M, Zahraei-Salehi T, et al. AZDAST the new horizon in antimicrobial synergism detection. MethodsX. 2016; 3:43-52. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed
  14. Taheri M, Mortazavi SMJ, Moradi M, Mansouri S, et al. Klebsiella pneumonia, a microorganism that approves the non-linear responses to antibiotics and window theory after exposure to Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015; 5(3):115-20. Publisher Full Text | PubMed
  15. Mortazavi SMJ, Mosleh-Shirazi M, Tavassoli A, et al. Increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays in mice and rats after exposure to microwave radiation emitted by a GSM mobile phone simulator. Dose-Response. 2013; 11(2):281-92. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed
  16. Mortazavi SMJ, Motamedifar M, Namdari G, et al. Non-linear adaptive phenomena which decrease the risk of infection after pre-exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Dose-Response. 2014; 12(2):233-45. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed
  17. Mortazavi SMJ, Motamedifar M, Mehdizadeh AR, et al. The Effect of Pre-exposure to Radiofrequency Radiations Emitted from a GSM Mobile Phone on the Suseptibility of BALB/c Mice to Escherichia coli. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2012; 2(4):139-46.
  18. Mortazavi SMJ. Window theory in non-ionizing radiation-induced adaptive responses. Dose-Response. 2013; 11(2):293-4. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed