p. 247−250
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 251−260
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 261−272
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 273−282
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 283−290
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 291−298
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
DTPS) for angles less than 20 and larger than 110 degrees. There is no statistically significant discrepancy in dose calculation by treatment planning system. Conclusion: Although the estimated error in dose calculation is not significant, there is still an opportunity to increase the treatment precision. The correlation between the error and the angle should be considered in further plans of brachytherapy. The present study showed comparable errors compared to results of other research studies.]]>
p. 299−306
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 307−318
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 319−328
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 329−340
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 341−348
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 349−356
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 357−366
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 367−374
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 375−382
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3
p. 383−386
2251-7200
Vol.10/No.3