Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering

Online Estimation of Elbow Joint Angle Using Upper Arm Acceleration: A Movement Partitioning Approach

Document Type : Technical Note

Authors

M Farokhzadi 1
A Maleki 1, 2
A Fallah 1
S Rashidi 1, 3

1 Biomedical Engineering Faculty, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Electrical and Computer Engineering Faculty, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

3 Biomedical Engineering Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Estimating the elbow angle using shoulder data is very important and valuable in Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) systems which can be useful in assisting C5/C6 SCI patients. Much research has been conducted based on the elbow-shoulder synergies.The aim of this study was the online estimation of elbow flexion/extension angle from the upper arm acceleration signals during ADLs. For this, a three-level hierarchical structure was proposed based on a new approach, i.e. ‘the movement phases’. These levels include Clustering, Recognition using HMMs and Angle estimation using neural networks. ADLs were partitioned to the movement phases in order to obtain a structured and efficient method. It was an online structure that was very useful in the FES control systems. Different initial locations for the objects were considered in recording the data to increase the richness of the database and to improve the neural networks generalization.The cross correlation coefficient (K) and Normalized Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE) between the estimated and actual angles, were obtained at 90.25% and 13.64%, respectively. A post-processing method was proposed to modify the discontinuity intervals of the estimated angles. Using the post-processing, K and NRMSE were obtained at 91.19% and 12.83%, respectively.

Keywords

Angle Estimation
Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Movement Phases
Hierarchical Structure
  1. bin Abdullah MFA, Negara AFP, Sayeed MS, Choi D-J, Muthu KS. Classification algorithms in human activity recognition using smartphones. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering. 2012;6:77-84.
  2. He Z, Jin L, editors. Activity recognition from acceleration data based on discrete consine transform and SVM. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2009. SMC 2009. IEEE International Conference on; 2009: IEEE.
  3. Kao T-P, Lin C-W, Wang J-S, editors. Development of a portable activity detector for daily activity recognition. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics; 2009: IEEE.
  4. Zhang Y, Markovic S, Sapir I, Wagenaar RC, Little TD, editors. Continuous functional activity monitoring based on wearable tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope. 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops; 2011: IEEE.
  5. Ravi N, Dandekar N, Mysore P, Littman ML, editors. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. AAAI; 2005.
  6. Mannini A, Sabatini AM. Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10:1154-75. doi.org/10.3390/s100201154. PubMed PMID: 22205862. PubMed PMCID: 3244008.
  7. Zhu C, Sheng W. Wearable sensor-based hand gesture and daily activity recognition for robot-assisted living. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans. 2011;41:569-73. doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2093883.
  8. Yang J-Y, Wang J-S, Chen Y-P. Using acceleration measurements for activity recognition: An effective learning algorithm for constructing neural classifiers. Pattern recognition letters. 2008;29:2213-20. doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2008.08.002.
  9. Kabir MH, Hoque MR, Thapa K, Yang S-H. Two-layer hidden Markov model for human activity recognition in home environments. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2016;2016:15. doi.org/10.1155/2016/4560365.
  10. Zheng Y. Human activity recognition based on the hierarchical feature selection and classification framework. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2015;2015:34. doi.org/10.1155/2015/140820.
  11. Krassnig G, Tantinger D, Hofmann C, Wittenberg T, Struck M, editors. User-friendly system for recognition of activities with an accelerometer. 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2010: IEEE.
  12. Lee MW, Khan AM, Kim JH, Cho YS, Kim TS. A single tri-axial accelerometer-based real-time personal life log system capable of activity classification and exercise information generation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1390-3. PubMed PMID: 21096339.
  13. Popovic M, Popovic D. A new approach to reaching control for tetraplegic subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1994;4:242-53. doi.org/10.1016/1050-6411(94)90011-6. PubMed PMID: 20870563.
  14. Maleki A, Fallah A. Using synergy to control reaching movement neuroprosthesis: muscle synergy or kinematic synergy. Iran J Biomed Eng. 2008;2:131:40. [in Persian]
  15. Hesam Shariati N, Maleki A, Fallah A. Genetic Feedforward-Feedback Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Control of Elbow Joint Angle. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering. 2012;2(1 Mar).
  16. Raj R, Sivanandan K. Estimation of elbow joint angle from time domain features of SEMG signals using fuzzy logic for prosthetic control. Int journal of current engineering and technology. 2015;5:2078-81.
  17. Kaliki RR, Davoodi R, Loeb GE. The effects of training set on prediction of elbow trajectory from shoulder trajectory during reaching to targets. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:5483-6. doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2006.260058. PubMed PMID: 17946704.
  18. Toosi MA, Maleki A, Fallah A, editors. Estimation and anticipation of elbow joint angle from shoulder data during planar movements. Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), 2011 2nd International Conference on; 2011: IEEE.
  19. Kwon S, Kim J, editors. Real-time upper limb motion prediction from noninvasive biosignals for physical human-machine interactions. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2009. SMC 2009. IEEE International Conference on; 2009: IEEE.
  20. Mijovic B, Popovic MB, Popovic DB. Synergistic control of forearm based on accelerometer data and artificial neural networks. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008;41:389-97. doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2008005000019. PubMed PMID: 18516468.
  21. Popovic M, Popovic D. Cloning biological synergies improves control of elbow neuroprosthesis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2001;20:74-81. doi.org/10.1109/51.897830. PubMed PMID: 11211663.
  22. Popović MB, Popović DB, Tomović R. Control of arm movement: reaching synergies for neuroprosthesis with life-like control. Journal of Automatic Control. 2002;12:9-15. doi.org/10.2298/JAC0201009P.
  23. Yoshikawa M, Mikawa M, Tanaka K, editors. A myoelectric interface for robotic hand control using support vector machine. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2007: IEEE.
  24. Micera S, Carpaneto J, Dario P, Popovic M, editors. Statistical and soft-computing techniques for the prediction of upper arm articular synergies. Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering, 2002. NEUREL’02. 2002 6th Seminar on; 2002: IEEE.
  25. Maleki A, Farokhzadi M. The user-friendly system for recording kinematic information of the limb motion using sensors based on the accelerometer. 17th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Isfahan, Iran, 2010. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-ICBME17-ICBME17_141.html.
  26. Bishop C. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer Science; 2006 p. 166-9.
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
25
September and October 2017
Pages 305-314

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us