Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate of Medical Physics, Department of Medical Physics, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

2 Isfahan UniM.Sc. Graduate of Medical Physics, Department of Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran versity of medical science

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Physics, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Medical Physics, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

5 Professor, Head of Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences,Semnan, Iran

Abstract

BackgroundOne of the most significant Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy treatment benefits is a high target to normal tissue dose ratio. To improve this advantage, an additional accessory such as a compensator is used to delivering doses. Compensator-based IMRT treatment is usually operated with an energy higher than 10 MV. Photoneutrons, which have high linear energy transfer and radiobiological effectiveness, are produced by colliding high-energy photon beams with linear accelerator structures, then they deliver the unwanted doses to patients and staff. Therefore, the neutron energy spectra should be determined in order to calculate and reduce the photoneutron risk.Objective: We have conducted a comprehensive and precise study on the influence of brass compensator thickness and field size on neutron contamination spectrum in an Elekta SL 75/25 medical linear accelerator with and without the flattening filter by Monte Carlo method.Materials and Methods: MCNPX MC Code version 2.6.0 was utilized to simulate the detailed geometry of Elekta SL 75/25 head components based on Linac’s manual. This code includes an important feature to simulate the photo-neutron interactions. Photoneutrons spectrum was calculated after the Linac output benchmarking based on tuning the primary electron beam.Results and Conclusion: Based on the Friedman and Wilcoxon nonparametric tests results (P<0.05), photoneutron fluence directly depends on the field size and compensator thickness. Moreover, the unflattened beam provides lower photoneutron fluence than the flattened beam. Photoneutrons fluence is not negligible in compensator-based IMRT treatment. However, in order to optimize treatment plans, this additional and unwanted dose must be accounted for patients.

Keywords

  1. Torre LA, Sauer AMG, Chen MS, Kagawa-Singer M, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, 2016: Converging incidence in males and females. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:182-202.
  2. Ron E. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Radiat Res. 1998;150:S30-S41.
  3. Bortfeld T. IMRT: a review and preview. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:R363.
  4. Chang SX, Cullip TJ, Deschesne KM, Miller EP, Rosenman JG. Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004;5:15-36.
  5. Vega-Carrillo HR, Hernández-Almaraz B, Hernández-Dávila VM, Ortíz-Hernández A. Neutron spectrum and doses in a 18 MV LINAC. Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry. 2010;283:261-5.
  6. Swanson WP. Calculation of neutron yields released by electrons incident on selected materials. Health Phys. 1978;35:353-67. PubMed PMID: 701032.
  7. Marx MV. NCRP Report No. 116 Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6:96.
  8. Guo S, Ziemer PL. Health physics aspects of neutron activated components in a linear accelerator. Health Phys. 2004;86:S94-S102.
  9. Schneider U, Lomax A, Timmermann B. Second cancers in children treated with modern radiotherapy techniques. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.017. PubMed PMID: 18707783.
  10. Brooks F, Klein H. Neutron spectrometry—historical review and present status. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2002;476:1-11.
  11. Forster R, Godfrey T. MCNP-a general Monte Carlo code for neutron and photon transport. Monte-Carlo Methods and Applications in Neutronics, Photonics and Statistical Physics: Springer; 1985. p. 33-55.
  12. Talebi AS, Hejazi P, Jadidi M, Ghorbani R. A Monte Carlo study on Photoneutron Spectrum around Elekta SL75/25 18 MV linear accelerator. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2016;4:48-57.
  13. Sheikh-Bagheri D. Monte Carlo study of photon beams from medical linear accelerators: optimization, benchmark and spectra: Carleton University Ottawa, Canada; 1998.
  14. Mesbahi A. A Monte Carlo study on neutron and electron contamination of an unflattened 18-MV photon beam. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:55-60.
  15. Kry SF, Titt U, Pönisch F, Vassiliev ON, Salehpour M, Gillin M, et al. Reduced Neutron Production Through Use of a Flattening-Filter–Free Accelerator. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2007;68:1260-4.
  16. Biltekin F, Yeginer M, Ozyigit G. Investigating in-field and out-of-field neutron contamination in high-energy medical linear accelerators based on the treatment factors of field size, depth, beam modifiers, and beam type. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics. 2015;31:517-23.
  17. Al-Ghamdi H, Al-Jarallah M, Maalej N. Photoneutron intensity variation with field size around radiotherapy linear accelerator 18-MeV X-ray beam. Radiation Measurements. 2008;43:S495-S9.
  18. Chibani O, Ma CMC. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs. Med Phys. 2003;30:1990-2000.
  19. Garnica-Garza H. Characteristics of the photoneutron contamination present in a high-energy radiotherapy treatment room. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:531.
  20. Mesbahi A, Keshtkar A, Mohammadi E, Mohammadzadeh M. Effect of wedge filter and field size on photoneutron dose equivalent for an 18 MV photon beam of a medical linear accelerator. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68:84-9.
  21. Kim HS, Park YH, Koo BC, Kwon JW, Lee JS, Choi HS. Evaluation of the photoneutron field produced in a medical linear accelerator. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;123:323-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl162. PubMed PMID: 17077093.
  22. Mao X, Kase K, Kleck J, Liu J, Johnsen S, Nelson W. Neutron sources in the Varian Clinac 2100C/2300C medical accelerator calculated by the EGS4 code. SCAN-9702021. Health Physics, 1996;72:524-9.
  23. Ahmed S, Rafi M, Jamil R, Khan MF, Maqbool A, Hashmi A. Neutron contamination in conventional 3DCRT treatment and step and shoot IMRT technique using 10 mv photon beam. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics. 2016;32:321.
  24. Howell RM, Ferenci MS, Hertel NE, Fullerton GD. Investigation of secondary neutron dose for 18 MV dynamic MLC IMRT delivery. Med Phys. 2005;32:786-93. doi: 10.1118/1.1861162. PubMed PMID: 15839351.