Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering

Measurement of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values of Ependymoma and Medulloblastoma Tumors: a Patient-based Study

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

H Taheri 1
M B Tavakoli 2

1 MSc, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.889
Abstract
Background: Some brain tumors such as ependymoma and Medulloblastoma have similar MR images which may result to undifferentiated them from each other.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of two different cerebellar pediatric tumors, including ependymoma and medulloblastoma which have shown similar clinical images in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods.
Material and Methods: In this analytical study, thirty six pediatric patients who were suspected to have the mentioned tumors according to their CT image findings were included in this study. The patients were subjected to conventional MRI protocols followed by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and ADC values of the tumors were calculated automatically using MRI scanner software.
Results: The mean (± SD) ADC value for ependymoma (1.2± 0.06 ×10-3 mm2/s) was significantly higher than medulloblastoma (0.87 ± 0.02 ×10-3 mm2/s) (p = 0.041). Moreover, the maximum ADC value of ependymoma was considerably different in comparison with medulloblastoma (1.4 ×10-3 mm2/s and 0.96×10-3 mm2/s, respectively; p = 0.035). Furthermore, the minimum ADC value of ependymoma was higher compared to medulloblastoma (1.0 ×10-3 mm2/s and 0.61×10-3 mm2/s, respectively), but there was not significant (p = 0.067).
Conclusion: Evaluation of ADC values for ependymoma and medulloblastoma is a reliable method to differentiate these two malignancies. This is due to different ADC values reflected during the evaluation.

Keywords

ADC
DWI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pediatric Tumors
Medulloblastoma
Ependymoma
  1. Arle JE, Morriss C, Wang ZJ, Zimmerman RA, Phillips PG, Sutton LN. Prediction of posterior fossa tumor type in children by means of magnetic resonance image properties, spectroscopy, and neural networks. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:755-61. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.5.0755. PubMed PMID: 9126888.
  2. Gupta R, Husain N, Kathuria M, Datta S, Rathore R, Husain M, editors. Magnetization transfer MR imaging is more close to histopathology than conventional MR imaging in intracranial tuberculomas. Proceedings of the Eighth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley; Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2000.
  3. Poretti A, Meoded A, Huisman TA. Neuroimaging of pediatric posterior fossa tumors including review of the literature. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:32-47. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22722. PubMed PMID: 21989968.
  4. Provenzale JM, Mukundan S, Barboriak DP. Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response. Radiology. 2006;239:632-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393042031. PubMed PMID: 16714455.
  5. Stadnik TW, Chaskis C, Michotte A, Shabana WM, Van Rompaey K, Luypaert R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:969-76. PubMed PMID: 11337344.
  6. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:53-60. PubMed PMID: 10030650.
  7. Gupta RK, Cloughesy TF, Sinha U, Garakian J, Lazareff J, Rubino G, et al. Relationships between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma. J Neurooncol. 2000;50:215-26. PubMed PMID: 11263501.
  8. Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology. 2002;224:177-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241010637.
  9. Gauvain KM, McKinstry RC, Mukherjee P, Perry A, Neil JJ, Kaufman BA, et al. Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:449-54. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770449. PubMed PMID: 11461881.
  10. Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H, Brown M, MacFall J. MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion-weighted echoplanar pulse sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:671-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109520. PubMed PMID: 8109520.
  11. Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, Shakudo M, Morino M, Ohata K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1081-8. PubMed PMID: 11415902.
  12. Morriss MC, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Hunter JV, Haselgrove JC. Changes in brain water diffusion during childhood. Neuroradiology. 1999;41:929-34. PubMed PMID: 10639670.
  13. Sener RN. Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2001;25:299-326. PubMed PMID: 11356324.
  14. Alexander AL, Tsuruda JS, Parker DL. Elimination of eddy current artifacts in diffusion-weighted echo-planar images: the use of bipolar gradients. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:1016-21. PubMed PMID: 9402204.
  15. Dietrich O, Biffar A, Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser MF. Technical aspects of MR diffusion imaging of the body. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.018. PubMed PMID: 20299172.
  16. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986;161:401-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909.
  17. Berens ME, Rutka JT, Rosenblum ML. Brain tumor epidemiology, growth, and invasion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1990;1:1-18. PubMed PMID: 2135961.
  18. Mardor Y, Roth Y, Ochershvilli A, Spiegelmann R, Tichler T, Daniels D, et al. Pretreatment prediction of brain tumors’ response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI. Neoplasia. 2004;6:136-42. doi: 10.1593/neo.03349. PubMed PMID: 15140402. PubMed PMCID: PMC1502089.
  19. Sinnaeve D. The Stejskal–Tanner equation generalized for any gradient shape—an overview of most pulse sequences measuring free diffusion. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A. 2012;40:39-65. doi: 10.1002/cmr.a.21223.
  20. Mohamed FF, Ismail AAA, Hasan DI, Essa WE. The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differentiation between the most common pediatric posterior fossa tumors. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2013;44:349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2012.12.011.
  21. Rumboldt Z, Camacho DL, Lake D, Welsh CT, Castillo M. Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1362-9. PubMed PMID: 16775298.
  22. Uysal F, Çakmakçı H, Yiş U, Ellidokuz H, Hız AS. Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in paediatric mitochondrial encephalopathy cases and a comparison of parenchymal changes associated with the disease using follow-up diffusion coefficient measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.031.
  23. Zitouni S, Koc G, Doganay S, Saracoglu S, Gumus KZ, Ciraci S, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35:448-53. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0652-9. PubMed PMID: 28550357.
  24. Pierce T, Kranz PG, Roth C, Leong D, Wei P, Provenzale JM. Use of apparent diffusion coefficient values for diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Neuroradiol J. 2014;27:233-44. doi: 10.15274/NRJ-2014-10027. PubMed PMID: 24750714. PubMed PMCID: PMC4202860.
  25. Kotsenas AL, Roth TC, Manness WK, Faerber EN. Abnormal diffusion-weighted MRI in medulloblastoma: does it reflect small cell histology? Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:524-6. doi: 10.1007/s002470050636. PubMed PMID: 10398789.
  26. Jaremko JL, Jans LB, Coleman LT, Ditchfield MR. Value and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging in grading and diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1613-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2155. PubMed PMID: 20538820.
  27. Filippi CG, Edgar MA, Ulug AM, Prowda JC, Heier LA, Zimmerman RD. Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:65-72. PubMed PMID: 11158890.
  28. Pillai S, Singhal A, Byrne AT, Dunham C, Cochrane DD, Steinbok P. Diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological correlation in pediatric medulloblastomas-”They are not always restricted!”. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:1407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1499-5. PubMed PMID: 21732119.
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Volume 11, Issue 1
43
February 2021
Pages 39-46

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us