Document Type: Original Research


1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424

2 Mochtar Riady Comprehensive Cancer Center Siloam Hospitals Semanggi, Jakarta


Background: The commissioning accuracy of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) need to be evaluated.
Objective: To test and evaluate commissioning accuracy of VMAT based on the TG 119 protocols at local institution.
Material and Methods: The phantom, structure sets, VMAT and IMRT beam parameter setup, dose prescriptions and planning objectives were following TG 119 guidelines to create local treatment plans of VMAT and IMRT. The local planning results were compared with the results of TG 119. Point measurement at high and low dose regions were measured using three ionization chambers with different active volumes (CC01, CC13, FC65G). The composite dose was measured by a 2D detector array and analyzed for the percentage of points passing the gamma criteria of 3 % dose difference (DD) and 3 mm distance-to-agreement (DTA) and 2 % DD and 2 mm DTA.
Results: The local treatment plans of VMAT and IMRT capable to meet the dose goals criteria set by TG 119 except for C-shape hard. Three ionization chambers with various active volumes for point measurement showed an increase in the confidence limit (CL), the larger the active volume was found proportional to increase the value of CL. The results obtained from ion chambers CC01 and CC13 could met the dose criteria set by TG 119, but results obtained from ion chamber FC65G fail the criteria. All gamma evaluation results show more than 95% data points pass the criteria of 3% DD and 3 mm DTA and the gamma index CL results fall within the TG 119 criteria, which is below 12.4.
Conclusion: TG 119 methodology and recommendations have successfully been used to evaluate commissioning accuracy of VMAT. The CL value of the study could be used as a reference and recommendation to evaluate the accuracy and integrity of treatment planning and treatment delivery systems of VMAT and IMRT.


  1. Webb S. The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:678-89. doi: 10.1259/bjr/65676879. PubMed PMID: 14512327.
  2. Yu CX. Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40:1435-49. PubMed PMID: 8532757.
  3. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35:310-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2818738. PubMed PMID: 18293586.
  4. Vanetti E, Nicolini G, Nord J, Peltola J, Clivio A, Fogliata A, et al. On the role of the optimization algorithm of RapidArc® volumetric modulated arc therapy on plan quality and efficiency. Med Phys. 2011;38:5844-56. doi: 10.1118/1.3641866.
  5. LoSasso T, Chui CS, Ling CC. Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode. Med Phys. 2001;28:2209-19. doi: 10.1118/1.1410123. PubMed PMID: 11764024.
  6. Alber M, Broggi S, De Wagter C, Eichwurzel I, Engström P, Fiorino C, et al. Guidelines for the verification of IMRT. ESTRO Booklet. 2008;7.
  7. Ling CC, Zhang P, Archambault Y, Bocanek J, Tang G, Losasso T. Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.060. PubMed PMID: 18793960.
  8. Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36:5359-73. doi: 10.1118/1.3238104. PubMed PMID: 19994544.
  9. Mynampati DK, Yaparpalvi R, Hong L, Kuo HC, Mah D. Application of AAPM TG 119 to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13:108-16.
  10. Kang DJ, Jung JY, Kim HJ, Park S, Lee KS, Sohn SC, et al. The Patient Specific QA of IMRT and VMAT Through the AAPM Task Group Report 119. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiological Technology. 2012;35:255-63.
  11. Wen N, Zhao B, Kim J, Chin-Snyder K, Bellon M, Glide-Hurst C, et al. IMRT and RapidArc commissioning of a TrueBeam linear accelerator using TG-119 protocol cases. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:74-88.
  12. Thomas M, Chandroth M. Local confidence limits for IMRT and VMAT techniques: a study based on TG119 test suite. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2014;37:59-74. doi: 10.1007/s13246-014-0241-5. PubMed PMID: 24414337.
  13. Vol I. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): contents. J ICRU. 2010;10.
  14. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197-212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392. PubMed PMID: 19810494.
  15. Laub WU, Wong T. The volume effect of detectors in the dosimetry of small fields used in IMRT. Med Phys. 2003;30:341-7. doi: 10.1118/1.1544678. PubMed PMID: 12674234.