Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, CMR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India

2 India Academic Programs Director, UC Berkeley, India

10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2402-1728

Abstract

Background: The Electromagnetic Field (EMF) effect is considered an alarming human health issue, dependent on the use of mobile phones. Several nationwide awareness programs on EMF Emissions & Telecom Towers were initiated by the Department of Telecom (DoT) to build a direct bridge between the number of investors and the information gap with scientific evidence. EMF interaction with humans has caused oxidative stress for brain physiological and pathological degeneration.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the EMF’s influence on oxidative stress and disorders of neurodegenerative.
Material and Methods: This analytical study is conducted on a generalized linear model, a supervised learning approach in machine learning, to understand mobile tower radiation. The data is obtained from open sources from two different states in India.
Results: Confidential Interval (CI) was obtained for measured value radiation for Andhra Pradesh in 2018-2019 as 95% CI [0.0045 to 0.0111] and for 2019-2020 as 95% CI [0.0016 to 0.0028]. Telangana -CI for Measured Value (MV) in 2018-2019 was found to be 95% CI [0.0500 to 0.0763] and 2019-2020 is 95% CI [0.0189 to 0.4345]. 
Conclusion: Generalized Linear Models (GLM) are the best statistical model to analyze the mobile tower radiation.

Keywords

  1. Ballard JS. Radiation Safety. Chapter Ionization & units of Measurement. Open Oregon Educational Resources; 2016.
  2. Wasilewska M, Bogucka H. Space-time-frequency machine learning for improved 4G/5G energy detection. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications. 2020;66(1):217-23. doi: 10.24425/ijet.2020.131866.
  3. Tenforde TS. Biological interactions and potential health effects of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields from power lines and other common sources. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:173-96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.001133. PubMed PMID: 1599584.
  4. Touitou Y, Selmaoui B. The effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on melatonin and cortisol, two marker rhythms of the circadian system. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14(4):381-99. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.4/ytouitou. PubMed PMID: 23393415. PubMed PMCID: PMC3553569.
  5. Garcia RM, Novas N, Alcayde A, El Khaled D, Fernandez-Ros M, Gazquez JA. Progress in the knowledge, application and influence of extremely low frequency signals. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(10):3494. doi: 10.3390/app10103494.
  6. Bonato M, Chiaramello E, Parazzini M, Gajšek P, Ravazzani P. Extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields exposure: Survey of recent findings. IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology. 2023;7(3):216-28. doi: 10.1109/JERM.2023.3268555.
  7. Gholipour Hamedani B, Goliaei B, Shariatpanahi SP, Nezamtaheri M. An overview of the biological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields combined with ionizing radiation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2022;172:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.04.008. PubMed PMID: 35513112.
  8. Torres-Duran PV, Ferreira-Hermosillo A, Juarez-Oropeza MA, Elias-Viñas D, Verdugo-Diaz L. Effects of whole body exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) on serum and liver lipid levels, in the rat. Lipids Health Dis. 2007;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-6-31. PubMed PMID: 18021407. PubMed PMCID: PMC2203969.
  9. Consales C, Merla C, Marino C, Benassi B. Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Int J Cell Biol. 2012;2012:683897. doi: 10.1155/2012/683897. PubMed PMID: 22991514. PubMed PMCID: PMC3444040.
  10. Choi SB, Kwon MK, Chung JW, Park JS, Chung K, Kim DW. Effects of short-term radiation emitted by WCDMA mobile phones on teenagers and adults. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:438. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-438. PubMed PMID: 24886241. PubMed PMCID: PMC4108016.
  11. Halgamuge MN, Davis D. Lessons learned from the application of machine learning to studies on plant response to radio-frequency. Environ Res. 2019;178:108634. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108634. PubMed PMID: 31450151.
  12. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC; 2002.
  13. Lázaro A, Chroni A, Tscheulin T, Devalez J, Matsoukas C, Petanidou T. Electromagnetic radiation of mobile telecommunication antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinators. J Insect Conserv. 2016;20(2):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s10841-016-9868-8.
  14. Kheifets L, Afifi AA, Shimkhada R. Public health impact of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(10):1532-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8977. PubMed PMID: 17035138. PubMed PMCID: PMC1626420.
  15. Fernández C, De Salles AA, Sears ME, Morris RD, Davis DL. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality. Environ Res. 2018;167:694-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.013. PubMed PMID: 29884550.
  16. Vecchia P, Matthes R, James Lin GZ, Saunders R, Swerdlow A. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). ICNIRP; 2009.
  17. Nam KC, Lee JH, Noh HW, Cha EJ, Kim NH, Kim DW. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30(8):641-50. doi: 10.1002/bem.20518. PubMed PMID: 19551766.
  18. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Principles for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 2020;118(5):477-82. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001252. PubMed PMID: 32251080.
  19. Repacholi MH, Greenebaum B. Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs. 1999;20(3):133-60. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(1999)20:3<133::aid-bem1>3.0.co;2-o. PubMed PMID: 10194557.
  20. Kim JH, Lee JK, Kim HG, Kim KB, Kim HR. Possible Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Central Nerve System. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2019;27(3):265-75. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152. PubMed PMID: 30481957. PubMed PMCID: PMC6513191.
  21. Persinger MA, Ludwig HW, Ossenkopp KP. Psychophysiological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: a review. Percept Mot Skills. 1973;36(3):1139-51. PubMed PMID: 4576236.