Document Type: Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Company of Samin Teb Soroush (Smart), Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Immunology, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Company of MEDITECHSYS, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis is a process of removing waste and excess fluid from blood when kidneys cannot function efficiently. It often involves diverting blood to the filter of the dialysis machin to be cleared of toxic substances. Fouling of pores in dialysis membrane caused by adhesion of plasma protein and other toxins will reduce the efficacy of the filtre.Objective: In This study, the influence of pulsed ultrasound waves on diffusion and the prevention of fouling in the filter membrane were investigated.Material and Methods: Pulsed ultrasound waves with frequency of 1 MHz at an intensity of 1 W/cm2 was applied to the high flux (PES 130) filter. Blood and blood equivalent solutions were passed through the filter in separate experimental setups. The amount of Creatinine, Urea and Inulin cleared from both blood equvalent solution and human whole blood passed through High Flux (PES 130) filter were measured in the presence and absence of ultrasound irradiation. Samples were taken from the outlet of the dialyzer every five minutes and the clearance of each constituent was calculated.Results: Statistical analysis of the blood equvalent solution and whole blood indicated the clearance of Urea and Inulin in the presence of ultrasound increased (p<0.05), while no significant effects were observed for Creatinine.Conclusion: It may be concluded that ultrasound, as a mechanical force, can increase the rate of clearance of some toxins (such as middle and large molecules) in the hemodialysis process.

Keywords

  1. Nissenson AR, Fine RE. Handbook of dialysis therapy: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
  2. Bai R, Leow H. Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater—the effect of system operation parameters. Separation and Purification Technology. 2002;29(2):189-98. doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00075-8.
  3. Cui Z, Chang S, Fane A. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2003;221(1):1-35. doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00246-1.
  4. Genkin G, Waite T, Fane A, Chang S. The effect of vibration and coagulant addition on the filtration performance of submerged hollow fibre membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;281(1):726-34. doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.048.
  5. Kennedy M, Kim S-M, Mutenyo I, Broens L, Schippers J. Intermittent crossflushing of hollow fiber ultrafiltration systems. Desalination. 1998;118(1-3):175-87. doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00121-0.
  6. Shakeri-Zadeh A, Khoei S, Khoee S, Sharifi AM, Shiran MB. Combination of ultrasound and newly synthesized magnetic nanocapsules affects the temperature profile of CT26 tumors in BALB/c mice. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2015;42(1):9-16. doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0558-4. PubMed PMID: 26578485.
  7. Shakeri-Zadeh A, Khoee S, Shiran M-B, Sharifi AM, Khoei S. Synergistic effects of magnetic drug targeting using a newly developed nanocapsule and tumor irradiation by ultrasound on CT26 tumors in BALB/c mice. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2015;3(9):1879-87. doi.org/10.1039/C4TB01708K.
  8. Jafarian Dehkordi F, Shakeri-Zadeh A, Khoei S, Ghadiri H, Shiran M-B. Thermal distribution of ultrasound waves in prostate tumor: comparison of computational modeling with in vivo experiments. ISRN Biomathematics. 2013;2013.
  9. Beik J, Abed Z, Shakeri-Zadeh A, Nourbakhsh M, Shiran MB. Evaluation of the sonosensitizing properties of nano-graphene oxide in comparison with iron oxide and gold nanoparticles. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 2016;81:308-14. doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.03.023.
  10. Chen D, Weavers LK, Walker HW. Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling: Effect of particle characteristics. Water Res. 2006;40(4):840-50. doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.031. PubMed PMID: 16442583.
  11. Kyllönen H, Pirkonen P, Nyström M. Membrane filtration enhanced by ultrasound: a review. Desalination. 2005;181(1-3):319-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.003.
  12. Masselin I, Chasseray X, Durand-Bourlier L, Lainé J-M, Syzaret P-Y, Lemordant D. Effect of sonication on polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2001;181(2):213-20. doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00534-2.
  13. Cai M, Zhao S, Liang H. Mechanisms for the enhancement of ultrafiltration and membrane cleaning by different ultrasonic frequencies. Desalination. 2010;263(1):133-8. doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.049.
  14. Lamminen MO, Walker HW, Weavers LK. Cleaning of particle-fouled membranes during cross-flow filtration using an embedded ultrasonic transducer system. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006;283(1):225-32. doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.034.
  15. Nii S, Oketani S, Kawaizumi F, Takahashi K. Effects of ultrasonic irradiation on solute permeation through a dialysis membrane. Journal of chemical engineering of Japan. 2005;38(7):497-501. doi.org/10.1252/jcej.38.497.
  16. Kobayashi T, Hosaka Y, Fujii N. Ultrasound-enhanced membrane-cleaning processes applied water treatments: influence of sonic frequency on filtration treatments. Ultrasonics. 2003;41(3):185-90. doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00462-6. PubMed PMID: 12726939.
  17. Kobayashi T, Chai X, Fujii N. Ultrasound enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration. Separation and Purification Technology. 1999;17(1):31-40. doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00023-4.
  18. Wei J, Wei G, Xiaoping L, Pingfang H, Yanru W. Effect of the ultrasound generated by flat plate transducer cleaning on polluted polyvinylidenefluoride hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2008;16(5):801-4. doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60159-7.
  19. Chai X, Kobayashi T, Fujii N. Ultrasound effect on cross-flow filtration of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 1998;148(1):129-35. doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00145-8.
  20. Chai X, Kobayashi T, Fujii N. Ultrasound-associated cleaning of polymeric membranes for water treatment. Separation and Purification Technology. 1999;15(2):139-46. doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00091-4.
  21. Wang X-l, Li X-f, Fu X-q, Chen R, Gao B. Effect of ultrasound irradiation on polymeric microfiltration membranes. Desalination. 2005;175(2):187-96. doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.08.044.
  22. Kennedy LC, Bickford LR, Lewinski NA, Coughlin AJ, Hu Y, Day ES, et al. A new era for cancer treatment: gold-nanoparticle-mediated thermal therapies. Small. 2011;7(2):169-83. doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000134. PubMed PMID: 21213377.
  23. Tatsumoto N, Kawano N, Tsuda M, Harada S, Fujii S. The effect of the ultrasonic irradiation on clearance in dialyzer-model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E). 1989;10(1):31-7. doi.org/10.1250/ast.10.31.
  24. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Principles and biophysics of dialysis. Replacement of renal function by dialysis: Springer; 1979. p. 38-68.
  25. Hakim RM, Lazarus JM. Initiation of dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6(5):1319-28.
  26. Depner TA. Hemodialysis adequacy: basic essentials and practical points for the nephrologist in training. Hemodial Int. 2005;9(3):241-54. doi.org/10.1111/j.1492-7535.2005.01138.x. PubMed PMID: 16191074.