Document Type: Original Research


1 MSc, Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran

3 MD, Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 PhD, Department of Health Information Management, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran


Introduction: Status epilepticus is one of the most common emergency neurological conditions with high morbidity and mortality. The study aims is to propose an intelligent approach to determine prognosis and the most common causes and outcomes based on clinical symptoms.Material and Methods: A perceptron artificial neural network was used to predict the outcome of patients with status epilepticus on discharge. But this method, which is understandable, is known as black boxes. Therefore, some rules were extracted from it in this study. The case study of this paper is data of Nemazee hospital’s patients.Results: The proposed model was prognosticated with 70% accuracy, while Bayesian network and Random Forest approaches have 51% and 46% accuracy. According to the results, recovery and mortality groups had often used phenytoin and anesthetic drugs as seizure controlling drug, respectively. Moreover, drug withdrawal and cerebral infarction were known as the most common etiology for recovery and mortality groups, respectively and there was a relationship between age and outcome, like as previous studies.Conclusion: To identify some factors affecting the outcome such as withdrawal, their effects either can be avoided or can use sensitive treatment for patients with poor prognosis.


  1. Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK. Status epilepticus. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:970-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804023381407. PubMed PMID: 9521986.
  2. Watson C. Status epilepticus. Clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment. West J Med. 1991;155:626-31. PubMed PMID: 1812633.PubMed PMCID: PMC1003112.
  3. Moayedi A, Atashabparvar A, Eftekhari E. Status epilepticus: etiology, outcome and predictors of mortality. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology. 2007;2:19-23.
  4. Riviello Jr JJ, Ashwal S, Hirtz D, Glauser T, Ballaban-Gil K, Kelley K, et al. Practice parameter: diagnostic assessment of the child with status epilepticus (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2006;67:1542-50. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000243197.05519.3d. PubMed PMID: 17101884.
  5. Jackson J. Data mining; a conceptual overview. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2002;8:19.
  6. Kamruzzaman S, Islam M. An algorithm to extract rules from artificial neural networks for medical diagnosis problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:10094566. 2010 ;12(8):41-59.
  7. 7. Farrokhi A, Talebi N, Safari F, editors. Automatic detection of epileptic spike using fuzzy ARTMAP neural network. Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on Signal processing, computational geometry and artificial vision; Taipei, Taiwan: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS); 2010.
  8. Sukanesh R, Harikumar R. A Comparison of Genetic Algorithm & Neural Network (MLP) In Patient Specific Classification of Epilepsy Risk Levels from EEG Signals. Engineering Letters. 2007;14(1).
  9. Aslan K, Bozdemir H, Sahin C, Noyan Ogulata S. Can neural network able to estimate the prognosis of epilepsy patients according to risk factors? J Med Syst. 2010;34:541-50. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9267-8. PubMed PMID: 20703908.
  10. Poursadeghfard M, Hashemzehi Z, Ashjazadeh N. Status Epilepticus in Adults: A 6-Year Retrospective Study. Galen Medical Journal. 2014;3:153-59.
  11. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H. Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:534-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.041947.
  12. Kwong KL, Chang K, Lam SY. Features predicting adverse outcomes of status epilepticus in childhood. Hong Kong Med J. 2004;10:156-9. PubMed PMID: 15181218.
  13. Rossetti A, Hurwitz S, Logroscino G, Bromfield E. Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:611-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.080887.
  14. Adibeik B. Status epilepticus: a review. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology. 2008;2:7-14.
  15. Akhondian J, Heydarian F, Jafari SA. Predictive factors of pediatric intractable seizures. Arch Iran Med. 2006;9:236-9. PubMed PMID: 16859058.
  16. Ashrafi MR. Status Epilepticus. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics. 2000;10:204-17.
  17. Moayedi A, Atashabparvar A, Eftekhari E. Status epilepticus: etiology, outcome and predictors of mortality. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology. 2007;2:19-23.
  18. Tabatabaei SS, Delbari A, Salman-Roghani R, Shahgholi L, Fadayevatan R, Mokhber N, et al. Seizures and epilepsy in elderly patients of an urban area of Iran: clinical manifestation, differential diagnosis, etiology, and epilepsy subtypes. Neurol Sci. 2013;34:1441-6. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1261-0. PubMed PMID: 23232961.
  19. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480-4. PubMed PMID: 46957.
  20. Huysmans J, Baesens B, Vanthienen J. Using rule extraction to improve the comprehensibility of predictive models. Behavioral & Experimental Economics. 2006:1-55. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.961358.
  21. Biswas SK, Mia MMA. Image Reconstruction Using Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) And Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier And Study Of Classification Accuracy. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2015;4:226-31.
  22. Yusiong JPT. Optimizing artificial neural networks using cat swarm optimization algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications. 2012;5:69-80.