Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiation therapy and Medical Physics, Faculty of medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Department of Radiology Technology, Paramedicine Faculty, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Radiation therapy, Faculty of medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Background: In radiotherapy, low-energy photon beams are better adapted to the treated volume, and the use of high-energy beams can reduce hot spots in the radiation therapy. Therefore, mixing low and high energies with different ratios can control the rate of hotspots, as well as the dose distribution of the target volume.
Material and Methods: The percentage depth doses (PDDs) were calculated at various depths, by using a fitted double exponential equation. Then, using quality factor equation and PDD of a 10×10 cm2 field, the amount of energy equivalent to each PDD and the value of weighting factors of 6, 18 MV energies were calculated to produce different energies. To validate the mathematical model, dosimetry of 10 MV energy was used. For this purpose, PDDs and dose Profile of 10 MV obtained from the mix were compared with ones obtained from the measurement
Results: The value of weighting factor of 6 MV energy required for the 10 ×10 cm2 field to create dose distribution of 15 MV energy using 6 and 18 MV energies was obtained as equal to 0.57. Comparison of percentage depth dose curves and dose profile shows good agreement with the practical measurements of 10 MV for 10×10 cm2 field using gamma index.
Conclusion: The simultaneous use of high and low photon energies with different weighting factors to achieve desirable energy makes possible the treatment of tumors located at various depths without the need for different modes of energy in the accelerator leading to a decrease in the cost of the equipment and a safer treatment of the cancerous patients.

Keywords

  1. Gustafsson A, Lind BK, Brahme A. A generalized pencil beam algorithm for optimization of radiation therapy. Med Phys. 1994;21:343-56. doi: 10.1118/1.597302. PubMed PMID: 8208209.
  2. Park JM, Choi CH, Ha SW, Ye SJ. The dosimetric effect of mixed-energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:3563. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563. PubMed PMID: 22089013; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5718752.
  3. Birgani MT, Fatahiasl J, Hosseini SM, Bagheri A, Behrooz MA, Zabiehzadeh M, et al. Breast Radiotherapy with Mixed Energy Photons; a Model for Optimal Beam Weighting. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:7785-8. PubMed PMID: 26625798.
  4. Lief EP, Hunt MA, Hong LX, Amols HI. Radiation therapy of large intact breasts using a beam spoiler or photons with mixed energies. Med Dosim. 2007;32:246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.02.002. PubMed PMID: 17980824.
  5. Khan FM, Gibbons JP. Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  6. Steeves RA, Thomadsen BR, Hansen H, Phromratanapongse P, Paliwal BR. A practical alternative to conventional five-field irradiation postmastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. Med Dosim. 1994;19:135-40. PubMed PMID: 7818751.
  7. Tahmasbi BM, Karbalaei S. Calculation of analytical expressions for measured percentage depth dose data in megavoltage photon therapy. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2009;11:140-4.
  8. LaRiviere PD. The quality of high-energy X-ray beams. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:473-81. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-737-473. PubMed PMID: 2496885.
  9. Wong JR, Cheng C-W. Method for producing a range of therapeutic radiation energy levels. Google Patents; 2002.
  10. Buzdar SA, Rao MA, Nazir A. An analysis of depth dose characteristics of photon in water. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2009;21(4):41-5.